Offers & methodology · Funding
Public funding for your Odoo project, country by country
Part of an Odoo project can often be covered by a public scheme — but which one, and what it actually pays for, depends entirely on where your company is registered. Four schemes are documented here: OPCO in France, SME Packages Digital in Luxembourg, PSG and EDG in Singapore. Pick yours below.
Choose your scheme
Four routes, four sets of rules
Start with your country. Each page covers who is eligible, what the scheme covers, the current support level and how we prepare the file with you.
France — Formation OPCO
OPCOs fund training, not software. On an Odoo project that matters more than it sounds: user training is one of the largest and most often underestimated lines in the budget, and it is the one that decides adoption. Applies to French companies through their branch OPCO.
Luxembourg — SME Packages — Digital
The scheme set up by the Ministry of the Economy together with the House of Entrepreneurship and Luxinnovation, and the one that names ERP and CRM explicitly among what it covers. It applies to projects within a defined budget bracket, which makes it a good fit for a first Odoo deployment in a Luxembourg SME.
Singapore — PSG — Productivity Solutions Grant
PSG supports pre-approved solutions from a published list, which makes it the faster and more predictable of the two Singapore routes. Suited to a standard Odoo deployment for a Singapore-registered SME.
Singapore — EDG — Enterprise Development Grant
EDG funds capability-building projects rather than a product off a list, so it fits a larger or more bespoke Odoo programme. Heavier to prepare than PSG, and assessed on the project you describe.
Registered somewhere else? Local schemes exist in most of the countries where we operate, and their logic is the same as the three above. Ask us and we will tell you within a call whether there is something worth pursuing where you are — including when the answer is no.
Before you count on it
What public funding changes, and what it does not
Two things are worth settling before a grant becomes part of your business case.
A grant lowers the cost of a project that was already worth doing. It rarely turns a bad project into a good one, and shaping a deployment to fit a scheme instead of your processes is the most expensive way to save money. We will tell you when that is what is happening.
Funding follows a calendar that is not yours. Submission windows, assessment times and the rule that most schemes will not fund what has already started mean the application has to be planned alongside the project, not after the kick-off. That timing is the single most common reason a company misses out.
Beyond that, the mechanics are ordinary: eligible cost categories, a project description, a budget, milestones, and evidence at the end. We produce most of that material for the implementation anyway, which is why the two exercises are worth running together.
How it works
Four steps, run alongside the implementation
Same sequence whichever scheme applies. The country changes the rules, not the method.
1. Eligibility scan
Your objectives, your Odoo roadmap and your constraints against the schemes open in your jurisdiction. The output is a short note saying whether this is worth pursuing at all — sometimes it is not, and that is a useful hour spent.
2. Mapping scope to eligible costs
We break the project into activities and cost lines and map them to the categories the scheme recognises: services, licences, training, infrastructure. What comes out is a realistic view of the covered share, not a headline rate.
3. Preparing the file
Priorities agreed, internal owners named, document checklist built, and the technical and project content drafted so the application matches the implementation we are actually going to deliver. Divergence between the two is what causes trouble later.
4. Assessment and follow-through
Answering the funder's questions, keeping scope changes aligned with what was submitted, and checking that the milestones and reporting the scheme expects fit the way the project is run.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Your country decides. A French company goes through its branch OPCO, and what is funded is training. A Singapore-registered SME chooses between PSG, for a pre-approved solution and a lighter process, and EDG, for a broader capability-building project that is assessed on its merits. If you operate in both, the two are separate applications on separate scopes.
Schemes rarely name Odoo; they fund digitalisation, productivity or capability building, and an ERP project qualifies under those headings. First-time rollouts, extension to new sites or departments, modernisation of production or logistics, and projects that visibly improve traceability, compliance, data quality or reporting are the usual profiles.
It varies by scheme, but typically: external services, some licence or subscription costs, training, and occasionally internal project staff time. Rather than quote a percentage that will be out of date, we work out the covered share for your specific budget during the eligibility scan — and the scheme pages carry the current rules.
A description of where you are today and what the Odoo solution will be, a project plan with milestones and named responsibilities, a budget broken down by cost type, and standard company and financial documents. Most of the first three already exist as project deliverables; we align them with what the scheme expects rather than writing them twice.
No, and nobody honestly can — the decision belongs to the funding body. What we can do is tell you early whether you are a plausible candidate, stop you spending weeks on a file that will not pass, and make sure the application describes a project we can actually deliver.
Let's talk
Not sure which scheme applies to you?
Tell us where your company is registered and what your Odoo project covers. We will come back to you with the schemes worth pursuing, the deadlines that matter, and an honest view of your chances.